Choosing WordPress OR Static Site Generator (SSG) for a Technical Blog

Choosing between WordPress and a Static Site Generator (SSG) (like Next.js, Hugo, or Jekyll) for a technical blog depends on your needs. Here’s a comparison to help you decide:

πŸ”₯ WordPress vs Static Site Generator (SSG) for a Technical Blog

FeatureWordPressStatic Site Generator (SSG)
Ease of UseBeginner-friendly, WYSIWYG editorRequires coding knowledge (Markdown, Git)
PerformanceCan be slow without optimization (due to PHP & database calls)Extremely fast (pre-built static files)
SEOSEO plugins like Yoast help optimize contentFaster page speed = better SEO
SecurityRequires updates & security pluginsMore secure (no database, no PHP vulnerabilities)
Hosting CostNeeds a server (can be cheap, but scales with traffic)Free/cheap hosting (GitHub Pages, Vercel, Netlify)
CustomizationThousands of themes & pluginsFull control, but requires coding
Content ManagementUser-friendly dashboardMarkdown-based, needs Git for publishing
ScalabilityScales with caching, CDNs, and optimizationHighly scalable (no dynamic processing)

πŸš€ When to Choose WordPress

βœ… If you want a non-technical, easy-to-use CMS
βœ… If you plan to publish frequently and need a WYSIWYG editor
βœ… If you need advanced plugins (SEO, analytics, monetization)
βœ… If you want multiple authors/contributors to publish easily

πŸš€ Best for: Non-technical users, content-heavy sites, business blogs


⚑ When to Choose Static Site Generator (SSG)

βœ… If you prioritize speed & performance (100% static, no database calls)
βœ… If you prefer Markdown & Git-based workflow
βœ… If you don’t need complex dynamic features (e.g., comments, memberships)
βœ… If you want cheap/free hosting (Netlify, Vercel, GitHub Pages)

πŸš€ Best for: Developers, technical blogs, documentation sites

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *