Choosing between WordPress and a Static Site Generator (SSG) (like Next.js, Hugo, or Jekyll) for a technical blog depends on your needs. Hereβs a comparison to help you decide:
π₯ WordPress vs Static Site Generator (SSG) for a Technical Blog
Feature | WordPress | Static Site Generator (SSG) |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | Beginner-friendly, WYSIWYG editor | Requires coding knowledge (Markdown, Git) |
Performance | Can be slow without optimization (due to PHP & database calls) | Extremely fast (pre-built static files) |
SEO | SEO plugins like Yoast help optimize content | Faster page speed = better SEO |
Security | Requires updates & security plugins | More secure (no database, no PHP vulnerabilities) |
Hosting Cost | Needs a server (can be cheap, but scales with traffic) | Free/cheap hosting (GitHub Pages, Vercel, Netlify) |
Customization | Thousands of themes & plugins | Full control, but requires coding |
Content Management | User-friendly dashboard | Markdown-based, needs Git for publishing |
Scalability | Scales with caching, CDNs, and optimization | Highly scalable (no dynamic processing) |
π When to Choose WordPress
β
If you want a non-technical, easy-to-use CMS
β
If you plan to publish frequently and need a WYSIWYG editor
β
If you need advanced plugins (SEO, analytics, monetization)
β
If you want multiple authors/contributors to publish easily
π Best for: Non-technical users, content-heavy sites, business blogs
β‘ When to Choose Static Site Generator (SSG)
β
If you prioritize speed & performance (100% static, no database calls)
β
If you prefer Markdown & Git-based workflow
β
If you donβt need complex dynamic features (e.g., comments, memberships)
β
If you want cheap/free hosting (Netlify, Vercel, GitHub Pages)
π Best for: Developers, technical blogs, documentation sites